Monday, January 7, 2019

2019 Toyota Sienna vs 2019 Honda Odyssey vs 2019 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2019 Chrysler Pacifica


To watch the video, click here.

The 2019 model year is here, so it’s time to return to our comparison tests. The four minivans being compared here are always constantly fighting to be the best people mover, and this year is no different. As minivan sales slouch and SUV sales continue to increase, however, some van’s very nameplates are at stake. Take the 2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, for example. 2019 appears to be the last year this vehicle will ever be in production, until all Fiat Chrysler minivan sales are redirected to the Pacifica. Ironically, the Grand Caravan still outsells the Pacifica handily, despite the van being essentially 11 years old. The Toyota Sienna is a fan favorite and thousands sell every month. Honda hopes to steal some of these sales with their relatively new van, the Odyssey. Before we begin evaluating each vehicle, I need to explain how I will conduct the comparison. I use a numerical points-value system at the end of the article to assess every area of each vehicle as objectively as possible. With that being said, let’s begin with our first area of appraisal: value. Our first van, the 2019 Sienna XLE, starts at $37,090. Standard features on the XLE include heated outside mirrors with blind spot warning and rear cross traffic alert, power sliding doors, one touch door handles, a power moonroof, 17-inch alloy wheels, and a three-zone climate control system. On the interior, the Toyota has a 7.0-inch color touchscreen that houses Entune 3.0, Toyota’s in-house infotainment system. The XLE version comes with a subscription to SiriusXM, Toyota Connected Services with WiFi, and other things. However, most of these items are on a subscription basis. All seats in this trim Sienna are leather and the front two captain’s chairs are powered and heated. Other features include dynamic radar cruise control, a leather trimmed steering wheel, a 4.2-inch display in the instrument cluster, remote start, and a smart key system also come in the Sienna. Parents will appreciate the universal garage door receiver, ten cupholders, the wide variety of USB and 12V sockets, and the power tailgate. They will further appreciate all of the active safety systems preventing the Sienna from running into other cars and people: included are pedestrian detection with a pre-collision system, and lane departure alert with steering assist. Though the Sienna may seem as though it is optioned well, the van was last fully redesigned in 2011, and it is starting to show. It does not accommodate for new technologies, like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. However, the Sienna does excel at moving people and objects, which is the main goal of a minivan anyway. Let’s move on to the 2019 Honda Odyssey EX-L, which begins life at $37,610. The exterior of the van features heated outside mirrors, power sliding doors, and a keyless entry and exit system. The Honda will automatically lock or unlock the car after the key either enters or exits an eight-foot radius around the vehicle. The moonroof on the Honda is powered like the Sienna, as is the tailgate, however users can set programmed height for the tailgate on the Odyssey. Push-button start and a tri-zone climate control system as well as a universal remote and a leather-wrapped steering wheel make life easier for Honda buyers. Additionally, the front two seats can be power adjusted many different ways, and are heated. The first two rows in the Honda are leather, and it also has remote engine start. Bluetooth, and seven speakers with a subwoofer come standard and the Honda has Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability on the Honda’s 8-inch color touchscreen. SiriusXM, collision mitigation braking, blind spot detection, a lane-keeping system and a road departure mitigation indicator are on all EX-L Odyssey’s. The 2019 Chrysler Pacifica Touring L starts at $35,945. Standard exterior features include 17-inch, ten-spoke wheels, LED headlights and taillamps, power sliding doors and liftgate, and heated exterior mirrors. On the interior, the vehicle has heated front seats, and an 8-way power adjustable driver’s chair. The Pacifica makes use of Chrysler’s excellent Stow-N-Go system, which allows for the second and third rows in the Pacifica to be folded into the floorboard with ease, so that the load floor of the rest of the van is flat. This eases cargo carrying capability and makes life with the Pacifica significantly easier. The Chrysler is dotted with 12-volt outlets and USB ports, and it also has a tri-zone climate control system, all leather seating and a leather-wrapped steering wheel. In the dash sits a 7-inch color touchscreen housing Uconnect, which is Chrysler’s infotainment system. Weirdly, the Pacifica supports Android Auto, but not Apple CarPlay. Fiat-Chrysler is the first company I have seen contract with one technology company but not the other. Six speakers, keyless entry, and push-button start round off the interior. Active safety systems on the Pacifica are actually pretty slim, offering only blind-spot detection and rear-cross path detection. It does have a parking aid that will brake for you when you are about to hit another vehicle or object, but other than that, more advanced safety systems will cost you extra. The 2019 Dodge Grand Caravan somehow manages to continue on into the year 2019, with only changes to the curtain airbags. Originally, 2018 was supposed to be the last year this vehicle was in production, but its sales have continued to be strong so FCA renewed its lease on life. Unfortunately, though the Grand Caravan sells in numbers, it cannot be the best van here. The Grand Caravan has been around since 2008 without any major updates, and it cannot compete with the likes of the Odyssey or even its own cousin, the Pacifica. However, since it remains such a strong sales contender, it is worth comparing it to the other vans. The top of the line Grand Caravan SXT starts at a comically low $31,750. On the exterior, the Dodge is gussied up with 17-inch aluminum wheels, heated mirrors, and a power liftgate and doors. On the interior, the Grand Caravan has a tri-zone climate control system, the same fantastic Stow-N-Go seats for the second and third rows seen in the Pacifica, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob. All seats are leather, and the driver seat is 8-way power adjustable, but the passenger will have to adjust their seat manually. Here again, the Grand Caravan has Android Auto but not Apple CarPlay. In the center console is a 6.5-inch touchscreen housing the usual Bluetooth and SiriusXM found in the other vans. The final two features on the SXT are remote start and keyless entry. Next, let’s evaluate the powertrains and performance of each van. The 2019 Sienna comes with a 3.5-liter V6 engine with 296 horsepower and 263 lb-ft of torque. This motor is mated to an 8-speed automatic transmission that drives the front wheels—AWD is optional. The powertrain is good for a 6.8 second run to 60 miles per hour, with a quarter mile time of 15.5 seconds. The 2019 Honda Odyssey also has a 3.5-liter V6, this time rated at 280 horsepower and 262 lb-ft of torque. The Honda has the most modern transmission of the group, a 9-speed automatic with paddle shifters. The 9-speed and V6 propel the Honda to 60 miles per hour in 6.7 seconds and the quarter in 15.2 seconds. The Pacifica has a slightly bigger 3.6-liter engine with 287 horsepower and 262 lb-ft of torque, and it matches the Honda’s 9-speed automatic. This setup is good for a 7.2 second 0-60 time and a 15.3 second quarter. Let’s move on to the Grand Caravan, which has the same 3.6-liter V6 as the Pacifica, but makes slightly less power at 283 horsepower and 260 lb-ft. Unfortunately, because FCA hasn’t put as much effort into the Grand Caravan as they have in the Pacifica, it retains only a 6-speed automatic. This hinders performance, and the Grand Caravan takes 7.9 seconds to reach 60 miles per hour and 16 seconds flat in the quarter. Next, let’s try and look at how family-friendly these vehicles are, because that’s what they’re designed for. The Grand Caravan and Pacifica have the Stow-N-Go seats which make increasing the cargo space significantly easier. The Pacifica has 165 cubic feet for passengers and can stow 140.5 cubic feet with all the seats down. It seats seven comfortably, but 8 in a pinch. The Honda has 160.1 cubic feet for passengers and 140.7 cubic feet behind the front row of seats, and seats 8. The Grand Caravan can hold 140.3 cubic feet of cargo space and is unrated for passenger space but seats a maximum of 7. The 2019 Sienna has a massive 150 cubic feet behind the front seats and is unrated in passenger space and can seat 8 if need be. Now, let’s move on to safety. Of course, each van has some array of active safety features, but let’s see what the crash-worthiness of each van is, per the IIHS. The 2019 Sienna gets ratings of ‘Good’, the highest mark possible, except for the small-overlap on the driver-side, which was ‘Acceptable’. The 2019 Pacifica is a top safety pick, and the only area it gets an ‘Acceptable’ rating on is the headlights. The trim we are comparing, the Touring L, has better headlights anyway. Oddly, the 2019 Odyssey gets the exact same ratings as the Pacifica, but the child seat-latch anchors are apparently easier to use. This means it too, is a top safety pick. The Grand Caravan is old, and as such wasn’t engineered to meet the small front overlap test, where it gets a rating of ‘Poor’. Most of the rest of the ratings are ‘Good’, but it wasn’t enough to give it a top safety pick. Let’s now look at fuel economy, as this is something every minivan driver is sure to have on their mind. The 2019 Sienna gets 19 miles per gallon in the city and 27 on the highway, for a combined 22 miles per gallon. The Odyssey gets similar mileage at 19 in the city, 28 on the highway, and the same 22 combined mpg. The Chrysler Pacifica gets identical ratings to the Odyssey, but the Grand Caravan shows its age with ratings of 17 in the city and 25 on the highway for a combined 21. Next, let’s look at our most controversial segment, which is styling. This is a subjective category, mind you, so take my ratings with a grain of salt. The Pacifica is about as seductive as a minivan can be, both inside and out, and manages to have the best looking exterior and interior. The Honda comes in a close second in terms of exterior, as does the interior, though to a lesser extent. I like the Dodge’s exterior better than the Sienna’s, but I like the Sienna’s interior more. Again, as are many other features of the Grand Caravan, the styling seems like an afterthought. This van was never meant to be beautiful though; form always follows function with this particular vehicle. Finally, let’s move on to our last area of evaluation, which is reliability. Of course, families want their van to be as dependable as possible, and the Toyota has them covered. According to Consumer Reports, the predicted reliability of a new Sienna is much better than average, compared to the Odyssey’s average rating, and the FCA cousin’s ratings of much worse than average. Well, that’s it for the 2019 minivan comparison! Here are the rankings of each van in each category on a scale from one to ten. The Sienna and Grand Caravan offer the most features for the money, hence their value scores. The Grand Caravan’s aging powertrain set it back in the powertrain and performance category. Its age shows again in the safety evaluation, where the two top safety picks each score a nine. The two Fiat-Chrysler vans score low in reliability, and the Grand Caravan falls behind again in fuel economy. For ease of use, the Pacifica and Grand Caravan both make gains for the Stow-N-Go seats, but the Odyssey and Grand Caravan are docked a point for seating one less person. Overall, the Sienna turns into the most well-rounded vehicle.






Saturday, December 1, 2018

2019 Toyota Camry vs 2019 Honda Accord vs 2019 Nissan Altima

Watch the video of this comparison here.

With the arrival of the 2019 Nissan Altima, it’s time to re-evaluate which of the big three family sedans is the best buy. The Camry has not been topped in sales in decades, with the Accord always in second place and the Nissan always in third. However, as my comparisons have proven, more often than not, the Camry isn’t the best vehicle. Oftentimes the Accord or even Sonata have it beat. The Camry and Accord were new for the 2018 model year, and the Altima is brand new, so none of these cars are even half way through their product cycles yet. Should make for a good, particularly fair comparison.
2019 Toyota Camry
            Now, let’s start with our first area of evaluation, which is value. The 2019 Toyota Camry XLE starts at $28,925. Standard features on the exterior of the Camry are LED headlights, taillights, and daytime running lights. Also included are heated outside mirrors, door handles with a touch-sensor lock or unlock feature, and 18-inch wheels. In the interior, the Camry houses dual-zone climate control, wireless smartphone charging, and a seven-inch information display in the gauge cluster. Front passengers live with luxurious leather-trimmed heated seats that are power adjustable eight ways for both chairs. The steering wheel is also leather and has the car’s Bluetooth and cruise control buttons. The XLE has a woodgrain interior, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and an anti-lockout feature. The smart key system works on the front doors and the trunk and it has push-button start. The main piece of technology in the interior is the eight-inch touchscreen in the dashboard that has Toyota’s infotainment system on-board. It has Apple CarPlay standard as well as a subscription to SiriusXM radio. The Toyota also has a HomeLink transceiver for your garage door and WiFi that’s limited to two gigabytes in the six-month trial (which is, of course, renewable). The 2019 Camry is packed with active safety features to help the driver be as safe as possible, such as lane-departure alert with steering assist, dynamic radar cruise control, a blind spot monitor with rear-cross traffic alert and a pre-collision system with pedestrian detection.
            The 2019 Honda Accord EX-L starts at a slightly more expensive $30,120. Exterior features that are standard on this trim are LED brake lights, fog lights and daytime running lights, heated mirrors with turn signal indicators and smart entry with walk away and auto lock. The Honda also has a power moonroof and 17-inch wheels. Moving to the inside of the car, we see a similar dual-zone climate control system, push-button start, leather steering wheel and shift knob, an auto-dimming rear-view mirror and HomeLink. Leather, heated front seats are 12-way power adjustable for the driver and four-way adjustable for the passenger. The driver seat has two memory programmable functions. In the center console is an eight-inch display with Bluetooth, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, HondaLink, SiriusXM, and a 450-watt audio system with ten speakers and a subwoofer. It’s worth noting that the Camry has a more standard six speakers. Active safety features on the Accord are lane-keeping assist with Honda Sensing, adaptive cruise control with low-speed follow, a traffic sign recognition system, collision mitigation braking, road departure mitigation, forward collision warning, and a blind spot information system with a cross traffic monitor.
2019 Nissan Altima

The Nissan Altima SL is brand new for 2019 and comes with a base price of $29,840. Exterior features include 17-inch wheels, LED headlights and fog lights, heated outside mirrors with turn signal indicators, and a power moonroof. The Nissan comes appointed with dual-zone climate control, remote engine start with intelligent climate control, and HomeLink. The Altima also has a smart key with push-button start. The seats are eight-way power adjustable for the driver and four-way for the passenger. The fronts are heated, and all seats as well as the steering wheel and shift knob are leather-wrapped. Interior trim in this version is wood, similar to the Toyota. The infotainment system touchscreen in the Altima is eight-inches like in the other two, but it also has navigation with voice recognition. SiriusXM, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and Bluetooth round out the standard technology services. The Altima SL has a premium audio system from Bose with nine speakers. Active safety in the Altima comprises of intelligent cruise control, forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection, intelligent lane intervention, blind spot warning, and rear cross traffic alert with rear automatic braking. Nissan has developed a few of their own unique safety features called ProPilot and Intelligent Driver Alertness. ProPilot comes in different forms in other manufacturers, but basically it slows down or speeds up the Altima to match the vehicle ahead of you in a form of autopilot. It is especially useful in stop-and-go traffic. The driver alertness system monitors steering wheel inputs from the driver to make sure the driver is staying alert and awake, and if they aren’t it will chime at them to wake them up or pressure them to take a break. Of course, for people that would rather fall asleep and wreck into a tree, the system can be turned off.
Let’s now talk about the passive safety ratings of each vehicle. The 2019 Toyota Camry is a Top Safety Pick Plus from the IIHS, getting good in every category and superior in front crash prevention. The 2019 Honda Accord is a Top Safety Pick, and gets the same ratings as the Camry in every category except headlights, where it got acceptable, preventing it from getting the ‘Plus’ designation. The 2019 Altima has not yet been rated by IIHS at the time of this writing, but the 2018 model received a Top Safety Pick rating and got good ratings everywhere except headlights, where it matched the Honda and child seat anchors, where it got marginal. Typically, newer models don’t perform worse than previous ones, so I’ll give the Nissan the benefit of the doubt and rank it the same as the Honda. If it receives even better rankings than I am predicting, I will edit the comparison and adjust the scores.
Next, let’s look at the powertrain of each vehicle, and its corresponding performance. The Toyota uses the familiar company 2.5-liter four cylinder. It received an update in 2018 and is now rated at 203 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. The transmission was also updated with the launch of the new Camry and Toyota dropped the antiquated six-speed for a new eight speed slushbox. The Honda has a smaller 1.5-liter inline four cylinder, that compensates for its smaller size with a turbocharger. It’s rated at 192 horsepower and 192 pound-feet of torque. In the interest of fuel economy, the Honda uses a Continuously Variable Transmission, or CVT. These transmissions have no actual gears, and are instead constantly shifting RPM, instead of upshifting or downshifting. The Nissan also uses a CVT, so it’s interesting to see Toyota sticking with a more traditional automatic. Companies have increasingly been switching over to CVTs in the name of fuel economy, so we’ll see later if the engine and transmission combination in the Camry will hamper its performance relative to the Nissan and Honda. Anyway, the CVT in the Altima is connected to a basic 2.5-liter four cylinder like the Camry, but it’s rated at 188 horsepower and 182 pound-feet of torque.
These engines aren’t the most powerful or the most fun, but let’s see how they’ll do in acceleration tests. The 2019 Camry hits 60 miles per hour in 7.6 seconds, while the Accord manages 7.3. The 2019 Altima is expected to be right in the middle of those times at about 7.5 seconds.
More importantly, let’s see how the powertrains line up when it comes to fuel economy, which is an issue deeply ingrained in this segment. The Camry, with its eight-speed automatic gets a very good 28 miles per gallon in the city and 39 on the highway. The Accord tops the Camry in the city by two MPG at 30, but loses one on the highway at 38. The Altima matches the Camry’s ratings exactly. Apparently, Toyota was able to stick with a larger engine and traditional automatic and still remain competitive.
Next, let’s look at our only subjective category, which is styling. It used to be that the Camry was the homeliest of the group, but with the 2018 update, the styling actually got—dare I say it—attractive. The Accord is still my favorite of the group, and the car genuinely looks good—much better than the previous generation. The Altima is also much better looking than the previous generation. I like all three, but I guess I still have to rank the Camry last even though it’s actually good looking. The Altima has a cookie cutter rear end that’s surprisingly striking, but it’s sort of unoriginal. Some Lexus, Kia, and the previous generation Toyota Avalon all have extremely similar rear ends, though I do think Nissan did the design the best. On the interiors, the Altima has the cleanest design, followed by the Accord. The Camry isn’t bad but the weird darked out shape in the center stack doesn’t flow well. I think the steering wheel looks dated, and I don’t think it’s changed much from the 2012 Camry. The Nissan’s small center and svelte shape are much more attractive.
Our final category to evaluate is reliability. I get my ratings from Consumer Reports, which has been testing each vehicle for years and has amassed an extensive database. The Toyota is, unsurprisingly, rated Better than Average, and the Honda gets Average, which also isn’t anything new. The Altima, however, matches the Camry’s rating of Better than Average, which is unusual for most Nissans. Nissans of yore were plagued with reliability issues and were typically related below average. In fact, I have seen countless mid-2000 era Nissans ready for the junk yard much faster than their owners anticipated. However, the new vehicles must be of better quality, for the 2019 Altima fares well in this testing.
Well, that’s all I have for this comparison! Here are the standings ranked for each car on a scale from one to ten. As you can see, there’s a lot to digest here. In all my years of comparing, the 2019 model year has never fared so well for Toyota. Though it didn’t win, it was extremely close, and usually the Toyotas are objectively noncompetitive. Welcome back, Camry. As you can see, the spread that separates the winning Altima from the losing Accord is one point, so all three of these cars are not only extremely close, but also all very good cars that I would have no problem recommending to people. In previous years, the Honda almost always won, and the Nissan has never won a comparison before, so these new models are really bringing some changes about. The Altima offered significantly better features than the other cars for a middling asking price, especially navigation, hence its value score. The Accord wins overall styling, but loses big points in reliability, because I assign two points to every level up or down in Consumer Report’s rankings. The Nissan won by a half point, which can be chalked up to nothing, but it’s a victory for Toyota and Nissan to even be competitive enough to beat the Accord. Tune in next year to see if Honda has a response.
Here are the standings and how I ranked each car. Altima's asterisk is because it's official IIHS ratings haven't been published yet.