Sunday, September 16, 2018

2019 Tesla Model S vs 2019 Chevy Bolt vs 2019 Nissan Leaf

Watch the video here.

Every year that goes by, electric and hybrid vehicles get more and more competitive. In 2019, the playing field is even more contested--the Chevrolet Bolt is the oldest vehicle here; and it’s only been out since 2017. Late last year, Nissan introduced the second-generation Leaf, and Tesla began making deliveries of its Model 3. These three environmentally-friendly cars are increasingly interesting, as the electric technology moves down market into the less expensive price ranges. Before we start the comparison, however, let me explain how I evaluate the cars. I use a numerical points value system to evaluate each vehicle in every category on a scale from one to ten. Furthermore, all of the prices in the video are before the federal $7,500 tax credit. Let’s begin the comparison with an assessment of value. The 2019 Chevy Bolt Premier starts at $41,780. The Bolt LT is cheaper, if that’s all you look for in a green vehicle, but for the sake of the comparison, I am trying to bring all of the prices within a couple thousand of each other. SiriusXM, push-button start, and upgraded 17-inch aluminum wheels come standard on the Bolt Premier, as do roof-rails, heated and power outside mirrors, and a leather-wrapped, heated steering wheel. The instrument cluster is an 8-inch screen, and a 10.2-inch screen sits in the middle of the dash and serves as the infotainment system. The screen controls Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Bluetooth, and voice-activated technology. All seats in the Bolt Premier are heated, including the rear. It also has lane change alert and a blind zone alert system. The Bolt has other nice features like location-based charge control, which tells the Bolt when it is at home, and what hours to charge during. A 4G LTE WiFi connection, GM’s OnStar system, a rear camera mirror, rear cross traffic alert and rear park assist also come standard. Creatures comforts like remote keyless entry, remote start, and surround vision are also standard. Surround vision is an advanced backup camera that gives the driver a bird’s-eye view of the vehicle to aid maneuvering in tight spaces. The battery is covered under an 8-year, 100,000 mile warranty, but the car has a three-year 36,000 mile bumper to bumper one. The Nissan Leaf SL starts at $36,200, but again, the base model Leaf starts at just under $30,000. The SL comes with LED headlights, foglights, and heated outside mirrors. The instrument cluster is one inch smaller than the Bolt’s at 7.0 inches, and even the SL only has a 7-inch touchscreen in the dash, compared to the Bolt’s 10.2 inch screen. However, the Leaf also comes with navigation, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and SiriusXM. The Leaf also has Nissan Connect EV services, also powered by SiriusXM. The Leaf too gains the bird’s-eye view camera. The car has intelligent cruise control, and a driver alertness system that monitors the driver’s steering inputs to determine whether the driver is becoming drowsy. It has a hybrid heater system, an intelligent key with push button start and an auto-dimming rearview mirror with HomeLink, a universal garage door receiver. The driver seat is 8-way power adjustable, all seats are leather, and the steering wheel is heated and leather-wrapped. The front two seats are also heated. The Nissan has a Bose audio system with seven speakers, one more than the Bolt has, and it’s a better system anyway. The active safety systems on the Leaf include rear-cross traffic alert, automatic emergency braking, and blind spot warning. The Tesla Model 3 Standard starts at $36,000. This base model car was never actually produced in 2018, as Tesla was only taking orders for the long-range, more expensive, all-wheel-drive Model 3. However, the base 3 will go on sale soon, in early 2019. Standard exterior features are limited to 18-inch wheels, and LED tail-lamps and running lights. The inside is better, with seven speakers, and a massive 15-inch touchscreen display that Tesla cars are known for. Additionally, navigation, an LTE WiFi connection, voice-activated controls, and Bluetooth are included. The front seats are heated and manually 6-way adjustable, but the Model 3 only comes with cloth seats. It does have a dual-zone climate control system, and an auto-dimming rear-view mirror. The active safety systems in the Tesla include a blind-spot sensor, and forward collision and lane departure warning. Compared to the other two, the Model 3 is pretty barren, even for the price point, compared to the other vehicles. However, you’re paying for different things in the Tesla, like the powertrain and supercharger network that the company has set up. However, the powertrain will be evaluated now, and will not count into the value segment, otherwise it would be double counted. Speaking of which, let’s look at the batteries, motors, and kWH of each car. All 2019 Bolts come with a 60 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery that supplies power to the electric drive unit, allowing 200 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque to drive the front wheels. In addition, the Bolt comes with a 120-volt portable charge cord. This set-up is good for a relatively quick 6.3 second 0-60 time. The Nissan Leaf comes with a 40 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery that is connected to a 147 horsepower, 236 lb-ft motor. This set-up is good for a 7.5 second 0-60 run. The Tesla Model 3 splits the difference between the Bolt and Leaf with a 50 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery, that routes 258 horsepower through the rear wheels. The torque ratings are not published for the standard battery, but the long-range battery produces 307 lb-ft, so expect something slightly less than that. The Model 3 is the only vehicle here that is rear wheel drive, which probably aids its 0-60 time be the fastest of the group, at 5.6 seconds. After powertrain and performance, we’ll do safety. As mentioned, each vehicle has a variety of active safety features like forward collision warning, blind spot detection, etcetera. Unfortunately, the IIHS has not fully tested any car yet, except the Chevy Bolt. It received a Top Safety Pick, with a superior rating in front crash prevention, and ‘Good’ ratings in almost all other areas of evaluation, the highest mark possible. Unfortunately, I will not be taking passive safety ratings into consideration at this time, as I cannot fairly evaluate the Model 3 and Nissan Leaf. I believe the Tesla to be a strong contender in this segment, however Consumer Reports found that the Model 3’s braking abilities were atrocious, taking nearly as much time to come to a stop as a semi-truck. Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO, said that the issue can be fixed quickly via the Model 3’s over-the-air software updates. The previous generation Nissan Leaf was a mixed bag in terms of safety—but that does not matter for the new car, which has been completely redesigned. Next, let’s focus on what makes these cars so unique, their all electric driving. Range anxiety has decreased over the years as electric vehicles become more par with the industry. The 2019 Bolt has a 238-mile range on a single charge. The little car also gets the gasoline equivalent to 128 miles per gallon in the city and 110 miles per gallon on the highway. Let’s move on to the Nissan. It has a much smaller range of 151 miles. The gasoline fuel economy equivalency is 125 mpg in the city and 100 on the highway. The standard Tesla can go 220 miles per charge and has yet to be rated for its gasoline mpg equivalent but expect its numbers to be right in line with the Bolt’s, as the Model 3 long-range version gets 131 mpg in the city and 120 on the highway. The standard 120-volt Basic charging system for the Bolt only gets you about four miles per hour charging. Obviously, this is not very good, so Chevy offers two upgraded systems, the Fast and Super Fast systems. The Fast, 220-volt system gives the Bolt 25 miles per hour of charge, and the Super Fast allows the Bolt 90 miles of range in 30 minutes. The Nissan starts at the 220-volt option, avoiding the 110-volt completely. In one hour, the Nissan can acquire 22 miles at 220 volts, and the same amount as the Chevy on the DC quick charging. The Tesla gets 5 miles per hour of charging on 110-volt, 22 miles on a 30 amp, 220-volt outlet, or a maximum 125 miles in 16-minutes on Tesla’s supercharger network, although Model 3 owners will have to pay for this service. Now let’s compare our most controversial area of evaluation, which is styling. Of course, to each his own, but in my eyes the Model 3 is the best looking vehicle of the group, in terms of exterior. The interior is clean and plain, but in pictures it comes off as odd. It’s much more appealing after you have sat in the vehicle. The Leaf has gone away with its oddball styling of yore, instead looking much more like a Versa than anything else, which is strangely a compliment in this context. The Bolt looks modern, but too much like a jelly bean. The Bolt’s older brother, Volt is executed better. In the interior battle, I think the Chevy probably wins, with the dashboard integrating the screen nicely and flowing around the driver. The cabin is extremely airy and the visibility out the front is great, something not represented well in the video. The Leaf isn’t far behind interior wise, but again, I feel like the center stack could be done better. The Leaf has a good-looking steering wheel, however. Finally, let’s look at our last part of this comparison test: innovation. This is the “cool-factor” of each car, and this category is unique to this comparison. Electric cars are still a new concept to the public, and it would be unfair to avoid acknowledging this. The Chevy Bolt isn’t necessarily cool, but it does have the biggest battery of the three and GM’s extensive electric vehicle experience in its past. It’s probably the lowest maintenance vehicle of the three. The Nissan Leaf has gone from decidedly uncool to at best “not ugly” but it to does not guarantee an owner bragging rights. A very middle of the road electric vehicle, when it seems like there are two other competitors that can offer more. The Tesla of course offers the most “innovative” factor. Wireless updates to the vehicle aren’t old yet, and other little gimmicks like the big screen, seductive styling, and brand name give it big gains in this segment. However, it still takes two to four months to get a Model 3, and the rear-wheel-drive version we are comparing here isn’t even on sale yet. Tesla has continued to struggle with meeting demand and making profits, and the company still is not on stable ground, financially. However, there is no denying that the Tesla offers more innovation than the other two vehicles for the same price. That’s all for the 2019 small electric car comparison! I hope you enjoyed reading.
2018 Tesla Model 3, via allcarseveryday

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

2019 Lexus RX vs 2019 Acura MDX vs 2019 Audi Q5 vs 2019 Cadillac XT5--Comparison

Watch the video here!

For the 2019 model year, I will be evaluating the 2019 Lexus RX350, the 2019 Acura MDX, the 2019 Audi Q5 Premium Plus, and the 2019 Cadillac XT5 Luxury. Though the tiny SUV segment is the fastest growing segment in America, these 4 luxury bruisers are still selling like hotcakes. Before I start the comparison, however, note that I use a numerical points value system at the end of the article for the final evaluation of every vehicle. With that being said, let’s get started with our first area of competition: value. The 2019 Lexus RX350 is the sales champion of the four vehicles we are comparing. The Lexus with the Luxury Package starts at $47,650. A pre-collision system with pedestrian detection, radar cruise control that can adjust speed to the car ahead of you, and lane keeping assistance are standard. The Lexus also has an 8-inch color infotainment system above the center console. Rain sensing wipers, heated outside mirrors and push-button start round off the standard features on every RX model. With the Luxury Package, the RX350 adds leather seats, wood interior trim, a memory function for the mirrors, steering wheel and seats, and the outside mirrors gain a power-folding feature and automatic dimming. The steering wheel is heated, and LEDs dot the interior as well as illuminate the doorsills. However, the biggest upgrade is the 20-inch chrome wheels. Next is the 2019 Acura MDX, to which I have added the technology package. All in, the MDX costs $48,600. Standard features include a power tailgate, moonroof and heated mirrors. Additionally, the MDX also has heated seats and a lot of technology advancements relative to the RX. An 8-inch touch screen in the dash comes in every MDX. Among notable features for the MDX are Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability as well as Sirius XM. All MDXs come with a wide array of safety features such as lane keeping assist, collision mitigation braking, adaptive cruise control and road departure warning. The package also brings an upgraded sound system, remote engine start, a blind spot information system, a rear cross traffic monitor, 20-inch chrome wheels, and a navigation system. That isn’t all, however: the mirrors also gain a power folding feature, the wipers can tell if rain is falling, and the MDX gains rear door smart entry. Compared to the RX350, the Acura is loaded for only about $1000 more. Let’s see how that lines up against the Audi Q5 Premium Plus, which starts at a conservative $45,500. The Audi comes with a 7-inch touchscreen, a similar audio set-up to the MDX, Android Auto and Apple Car Play and Sirius XM. It has keyless entry and a hands-free tailgate, as well as rain-sensing wipers. It has a park assist system, and side exit assistance which is where the car warns you before you open your car door into a cyclist or passing car. It has rear cross traffic alert but is missing a very advanced cruise control system and other safety systems. It has heated leather seats with a driver-side memory function. It has wood inlays in the interior, and a panoramic sunroof. The outside mirrors are power-folding, auto-dimming, and heated, as well. The Audi is optioned better than the RX but not as good as the MDX is. However, it manages to retain 80% of the Acura’s features for over $3,000 less. Our final contender, the XT5, is the surprise sales success from Cadillac, only being bested in sales by the ever-popular RX. The XT5 Luxury starts at $47,590. It has rear-cross traffic alert, parking assist, a power sunroof, a power liftgate, and keyless entry and push-button start. A heated steering wheel is also included. Sirius XM is available through the Cadillac’s 8-inch touchscreen. Notably missing from the XT5 are standard safety features like adaptive cruise control and collision mitigation braking. They are optional but stick out like a sore thumb relative to the RX and MDX. Next let’s evaluate safety. All four of these small luxury SUVs score very well in all tests, earning ‘Good’ ratings in every category save headlights. However, with the trim specced in these models, even the headlight rating should be good. Every vehicle is a top safety pick except for the Cadillac XT5, probably because it gets an ‘Acceptable’ rating for the child seat anchors, where the other vehicles score better. Overall, pretty similar, though as mentioned before, the MDX and RX have more active safety features than the others. Moving on to fuel economy, the Lexus RX350 front wheel drive model achieves 20 miles per gallon in the city and 27 miles per gallon in the highway. The MDX is similar at 19 in the city and 27 on the highway. The Audi gets a solid 23 in the city but can only muster 25 on the highway, while the XT5 splits the difference at 19 and 26, respectively. As for styling, this is of course a subjective category. The RX is polarizing, to say the least. Whether or not you like the design is up to you, but personally, I like the MDX the best, exterior wise. The Audi is kind of plain, and the XT5 isn’t bad looking. The interiors are also a very close race, with the RX350 being my favorite, followed by the Lexus and MDX. The Cadillac is clean but I don’t find it as much to my taste. The next category in which these SUVs will compete is performance. The Lexus comes with a 3.5 L V6 with 295 horsepower and 263 pound-feet, routing power via an 8-speed automatic with paddle shifters. Test numbers indicate that the RX350 can get to 60 miles per hour in 7.5 seconds, running through the quarter mile in 15.7 seconds at 91.1 miles per hour. The Cadillac has 310 horsepower and 271 pound-feet of torque from its 3.6 L V6. The XT5 is similarly equipped with an 8-speed auto with paddle shifters. The Caddy makes do with its power advantage, with a solid 6.3 second 0-60 and a 14.7 quarter mile. The Acura MDX has a 290 horsepower, 267 pound-feet 3.5 L V6, mated to a new 9-speed automatic with paddles. The Acura is quick, at 5.7 seconds to 60 and 14.5 seconds in the quarter mile. The Audi is the odd one out in terms of powertrain, coming with a 2.0 L turbocharged four-cylinder. The engine is capable of 252 horsepower and 273 pound-feet. It is connected to a 7-speed tiptronic automatic transmission. The Audi is the only vehicle here with AWD, as it comes standard on every Q5. With this set-up, the Q5 can blitz 60 in 5.8 seconds, tearing through the quarter in 14.5, nearly matching the Acura perfectly. Reliability is always something families are concerned about, and seeing as families are the primary demographic for these vehicles, I have compiled the statistics from Consumer Report’s most recent 2018 buyers guide. The 2019 Acura MDX’s predicted reliability is rated at average, as is the Cadillac’s. The Audi and RX350 managed to score better than average. Well, that about wraps it up for this year’s 2019 showdown. Here are the results from each category the SUV's were evaluated in on a scale from one to ten. The Audi won by a small margin, not the outcome I was expecting. Turns out it is a jack of all trades and a master of none, which was enough to give it the upper hand versus its competition.

The categories, ranked.




2019 Audi Q5, via allcarseverday

2019 Lexus RX, via allcarseveryday

2019 Cadillac XT5, via allcarseveryday
2019 Acura MDX, via allcarseveryday